The lawyer appreciated the proposal of the Ministry of interior to punish the violators of traffic rules based on the video

© RIA Novosti / Maxim to Aminopherase in foobarcontroller DPS while on duty on one of the highways in the Moscow region. Archival photoThe lawyer appreciated the proposal of the Ministry of interior to punish the violators of traffic rules based on the video© RIA Novosti / Maxim to Aminopherase the image Bank

Modern methods of proof, including video recording of violations of traffic Rules (SDA), can and should be used to prosecute offenders, said RIA Novosti lawyer Sergei Gorbachev, managing partner of «Legis Group».

Earlier on Monday on the website of the Cabinet of the Russian Federation has information that the interior Ministry proposes to allow employees of traffic police to punish drivers who committed an administrative offense, having as reason only the video the violation of citizens registered on a Single portal of public services.

«Anyway, modern methods of proof can and should be used in any process, especially associated with punishment», — said Gorbachev.

In addition, according to him, the legal regulation of methods that simplifies proof in cases of administrative offences is able to accelerate the replenishment of the budget at the expense of penalties paid conscious citizens under the yoke of irrefutable videolib.

«However, it is important that law, ironically, the offenders were duly protected and guaranteed by the state. But for this, again, will have to establish a comprehensive and clearly interpret the requirements for video evidence from the point of view of their admissibility and the relevance to that most of the alleged administrative offence», — said the lawyer.

Are you ready to report traffic violations by sending the video through the portal?

  • Yes, if offenders do will be punished
  • No, I think this is whistleblowing
  • Depends on how it will be convenient in technical terms

Results

  • 58.0%

    Yes, if offenders do will be punished

  • 21.9%

    No, I think this is whistleblowing

  • 20.1%

    Depends on how it will be convenient in technical terms

All proygressive He believes that procedural questions should be formulated in such a way that in the presence of the slightest doubts about the authenticity of the video evidence, the administrative proceedings could be promptly revised, and the state would take care of the formulation of the technical requirements of video testimony which can be used in the proceedings.

«I do not think that the method of video detection precisely because of the non-public nature (no one expects that he will fall), can seriously affect the decrease in the number of offences, but cannot be ruled out that everything will happen exactly the opposite,» — said the Agency interlocutor.

Source

Be the first to comment on "The lawyer appreciated the proposal of the Ministry of interior to punish the violators of traffic rules based on the video"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*