Experts said that not all fall for the appointment of heads of regions was successful

© RIA Novosti / Alexei Druginderal in fotobasketball official. Archival photoExperts said that not all fall for the appointment of heads of regions was successful© RIA Novosti / Alexei Druginderal the image Bank

Experts of Committee of civil initiatives (THD) Alexei Kudrin considers that not all of the acting governors appointed this autumn, will be successful, it is possible that some of them are waiting for a new rotation.

At the end of September — beginning of October the resignation of the head of the 11 regions: Dagestan, Primorye, Krasnoyarsk region, Samara region, Nizhny Novgorod region, Nenets Autonomous district, the Orel region, the Novosibirsk region, the Omsk region, the Ivanovo region, the Pskov region.

«As appointees of this year, I think the center will monitor the situation, including ratings, protest activity and the situation with the elites, and depending on monitoring this situation decisions will be taken. It is already clear that some of the appointees, in principle, can be considered relatively successful, but part of it is already clear that does not really fit,» he told reporters Alexander Kynev after the presentation of the report «Socio-economic and political tensions in the regions. Based on the first half of 2017 goals».

According to Alexey Titkova, a significant part of the governors that were dismissed in the fall of 2017, are appointees of 2014, thus, the average term of appointments the last three years, that is less than the electoral period. Nikolai Petrov believes that this can be several explanations.

«One answer is a bad model, and the governors, which was appointed in 2014, showed his lack of effectiveness, but then it should be counted as a lesson and to draw conclusions. The second possible answer to this question: changed the functionality. Three years ago they were appointed under some tasks, change tasks today, and then we have to understand what this task. The third choice: a rotation of three years was enough. And this, I think, the most dangerous option,» — said Petrov.

According to him, the approach of technologists who today are related to the selection of the personnel reserve for appointment of governors, is very simple: there is a universal technique that allows to effectively manage anything: farm, Museum, Legion, Ministry, and still to appoint a Manager: in Kaliningrad, Ivanovo or Dagestan.

«It’s awfully dangerous, it is absolutely not working in relation to the regions, especially today, when the pendulum of relations between the center and the regions wants the center or not, will shift to the regions. And then we get the regions where people are sitting, who are unable to consolidate regional political elites. They may be brilliant managers at the level of FSO or the economy, but completely unfit for this role. No plans, of course, change them in six months, but it would not have had to do it in a year,» — concluded Petrov.