Siemens did not prove that he was deceived in the transaction turbines

© RIA Novosti / Vladimir Sergeevicha in photobacteria of Siemens in Moscow. Archival photoSiemens did not prove that he was deceived in the transaction turbines© RIA Novosti / Vladimir Sergeevicha the image Bank

The Moscow arbitration court has not found arguments to recognize the transaction on the supply of turbines Siemens subsidiary «Rosteh»- the company «Tekhnopromexport» is invalid, the German company not proved a deception, said the court’s decision.

«In violation of the provisions of article 65 of the Arbitration procedural code of the Russian Federation, the plaintiffs in the original lawsuit did not prove that plaintiff-2 (plant STGT Siemens to produce turbines — ed.) had the wrong idea about the nature and subject of the disputed contract. Evidence that the defendants intentionally created the plaintiffs factually inaccurate idea about the nature of the transaction, its terms, identity of parties, subject matter, other circumstances that influenced the decision of the plaintiff 2 to sign the disputed contract in the case provided», — stated in the decision.

«In view of the above legal grounds for invalidation of transactions on the arguments made in the initial lawsuit, and also to apply consequences of invalidity of transactions provided for in paragraph 2 of article 167 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation. In satisfaction of the initial claim should be denied», — stated in the decision.

Siemens summer stated that all four turbines are designed once for a project in Taman, was illegally delivered to the Crimea. In this regard, the group announced the intention to terminate the license agreement with Russian companies to supply equipment for power plants and to suspend deliveries under existing contracts.